If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Ford Vs. Firestone. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Ford Vs. Firestone paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Ford Vs. Firestone, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Ford Vs. Firestone paper at affordable prices!
Even after 88 deaths and 50 injuries attributed to defective Firestones tires, Firestone and Ford continue to point their finger at each other and refuse to be held liable. The question now is who is going to be held accountable and whether or not either company knew of the problems with the faulty tires even before it started to create this many issues. This liability issue has created one of the largest tire recalls ever and Firestone and Ford are being accused of knowing about the faulty tires.
In his article in Septembers edition of Newsweek, Kevin Naughton writes about what has become one of the biggest tire recalls ever. He tells a story about Lori Laurus who, on Labor Day 186, had her Firestone tire shred off her Ford Explorer causing her sports utility vehicle to flip. According to Naughton, Ms. Laurus is disgusted with both Firestone and Ford for not immediately looking into the defective tire issue. Along with many others, she believes that Firestone and Ford have known about these defective tires for years now.
According to Naughton, Firestone and Ford have started some damage control procedures by recalling 6.5 million defective Firestone ATX and Wilderness tires found primarily on Ford Explorers. Federal regulators suspect that these defective tires have led to deaths of 88 individuals in the US. Naughton also mentions that criminal charges are being considered against both companies in Venezuela. Regulators there accuse Firestone and Ford of a conspiracy against the users of Ford Explorers resulting in at least 46 deaths in Venezuela. According to Naughton, Ford did replace faulty Firestone tires in Venezuela months before the recall was announced in the US. His article also goes into detail about how many believe the companies have known about the faulty tires for years. Documents have been found showing reimbursement by Firestone to some consumers for the faulty ATX tires dating back to the beginning of 18. In 18, Ford noticed the peeling-tire tread problem on Ford Explore!
rs in Saudi Arabia, Asia and South America and quietly began replacing tires on almost fifty thousand foreign vehicles. It was only this past May that Ford shared this information with US regulators who now demand more documents on Fords oversea recalls.
Order Custom Essay on Ford Vs. Firestone
In a similar article in Time Magazine, Daniel Eisenberg also writes about the Firestone recall. Eisenberg tells a story about Jessica LeAnn Taylor of Mexia, Texas who died on October 18, 18 when the Ford Explorer that she was in that day rolled over because of a Firestone tire that had peeled off. Jessicas family turned to Attorney Randy Roberts to represent them in case against Firestone and Ford. According to Eisenberg, Ford has fought hard to keep its consumer complaints and lawsuits private until November , 1 when judge Sam Bournias ordered Firestone to hand over any complaints and other lawsuits, as well as employee depositions from those lawsuits, concerning its ATX and Wilderness tires nationwide.
In her article, Eisenberg presents some hard-core facts about the allegations against Firestone and Ford. According to Randy Roberts, there had been more than 1,100 incident reports and 57 lawsuits by February this year that Firestone and Ford has not disclosed. By spring of 1, Firestone has already logged 800 customer complaints of tread separation on its ATX and Wilderness tires. Congressional investigators have also connected 14 deaths in Saudi Arabia and surrounding Gulf States to some of the tires and found that Ford had been quietly replacing the defective tires in the summer of 1. Ford too may have had some fault in the design of the defective tires because it is said that Ford company engineers instead of making more substantial improvements to the SUVs stability, advised inflating the tires less than maximum level to decrease the chance of roller over. Ford recommended that the tires for their Explorers have a lower level of air pressure, 6 PSI compared wit!
h Firestones suggested 0 PSI, even though under inflated tires can in turn increase the risk of tread separation.
After further investigation, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that the ATX and Wilderness tires manufactured at the Firestone Decatur, Ill. Plant were where most of the recalled tires were made. Some of Firestones ex-employees testified that in the mid-10s there were some quality control problems at the plant. For example, in ordered to speed up the production process, the plant shortened the time spent curing, or cooking, the tires from 6 minutes to 16 minutes. It was also said that from 14-15 the assembly lines at the Firestone Decatur plant were in the hands of unskilled workers when the company had been through a bitter 10-month strike. In that time period, there were also some management changes and quality may have been scarified for quantity.
This matter has stirred up quite a bit of controversy about who essentially should be held liable for the damages that these tires have caused. One can called this a true product liability matter. One faulty tire incident should have sparked some sort of immediate investigation on the defective tire matter and immediate action should have been taken to remove the tires from the market. Instead, both companies decided to gamble with the idea of allowing these faulty tires to be distributed worldwide. In the end, lives have been lost and it was all due to pure negligence. One can define negligence as the failure to follow some generally accepted standard of care. For example, Firestone should have made sure that the routine inspections that the tires plants are put through should have been done thoroughly and Ford who has been in business with Firestone for almost a century should have done some follow up on these inspections to make sure that the tires were being produced at th!
e same level of standard. These faulty tires were clearly not put to the same level of standard as other Firestone tires or other tires of its kind.
One should not have any sympathy for companies like Firestone or Ford. It should be a crime for any company to allow a faulty product to be out on the market and for those manufacturers and sellers who knowingly allow the defective product to be sold on the market they should be charged with strict liability with criminal charges. The individuals who run these huge corporations should be held accountable for the harm that these products have and will cause, especially if they knowingly allow the product to be out on the marketmay no longer have the same faith in their product.
Please note that this sample paper on Ford Vs. Firestone is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Ford Vs. Firestone, we are here to assist you.Your persuasive essayon Ford Vs. Firestone will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
