If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate paper at affordable prices!
"Humans, Thomas Hobbes stated, need to "confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that they may reduce all their wills by plurality of voices, unto one voice."
Resolved, when in conflict, globalization ought to be valued above national sovereignty.
The following affirmative case is based on the value of societal advancement and is measured my value criterion of social unification.
The following definitions are offered to clarify this round
Write my Essay on Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate
Social unification different societies and communities working together to creat a better society.
Globalization to make global, including but not limited to free trade and open markets.
Contention One Globalization promotes international peace. As Thomas Hobbes stated in his social contract, humans, without someone watching over them, are prone to destroy each other. This is why societies establish governments in the first place, because they are not adequately protected without them. Neighboring societies and their heads of states or dictators are constantly threatening each other over territory and national resources. Sometimes these conflicts begin as irrational attempts to further aggravate personal vendettas.
If the majority of the world acted collectively towards world peace, international bickering would become obsolete. For example, when UN weapon inspectors went to Iraq to look for illicit nuclear weapons they were making a movement towards peace and disarmament. When international bickering becomes obsolete, the emphasis of the nations would shift from military gain to that of societal and social advancement.
Less than one per cent of what the world spends today on weapons could be used to put every single child into school by next year. Dwight D. Eisenhower stated that "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, and those who are cold and not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists.. under the cloud of war."
Over the last century alone, the forces of globalization have been among those that have contributed to a huge improvement in human welfare, including raising countless millions out of poverty. Going forward, these forces have the potential to continue bringing great benefits to the poor and needy, as well as pulling our most genius scientist out of a bunker making bombs and putting them
into the lab curing aids.
Contention two Globalization would largely improve the lives of all on the globe, especially open trade in a globalized sense.
It would make new products and ideas universally available. Society overall would advance. Open trade among nations contributes a more peaceful world, because it create a sort of interdependence among nations. This interdependence will certainly never stop war, but it will make it extremely less likely because these nations will not want to jeopardize their own economies over trivial personal vendettas or territories. National resources would be easier to get, and be traded without costly tariffs.
Because developing countries need trade partners to survive in the international arena it is important to avoid things like war, thus peace is encouraged.
Right now, the world has such extreme poverty and fluctuating trade barriers. Simples studies who that there is enough food on the earth to feed its people, and then some. Yet currently the lives of 1.7 million children will be needlessly lost this year because their governments have not reduced poverty levels for them, or because they have expected their governments to do so.
These staggering numbers suggest indeed that man cannot care for himself properly if different nations are fluctuating trade tariffs and withholding food to gain political power. Perhaps if trade was simply made a global activity, the market would become a freedom for capital, goods, and service, where the market is self-regulating, thus allowing the trickle-down notion of wealth distribution. It also includes the deunionizing of labor forces and removes of any impediments towards capital mobility. Opening up international trade has helped many counties grow far more quickly than they would otherwise have done. International trade helps economic development when a nation's exports drive its economic growth. Exported growth was the centerpiece of the industrial policy that enriches much of Asia." According to Linda Lim, "The most globalized developing nations, in East and Southeast Asia, grew the most rapidly allowing poverty rates to fall by 174 million while the least globalized, the Middle East and Africa, grew the least. All developing regions grew more rapidly than developed countries, which grew more slowly narrowing the income gap."
We are looking at a massive breakthrough in trade and advancement of mankind when globalization is accepted.
My third contention is that globalization ensures more legitimate government.
If the countries on the globe taking different stabs at different types of governments, people are going to be abused. There is going to be tyranny, dictatorship, and oppression. A globalized check and balance for the world will provide more
With a unified communities and a globalized world the advancement of society is not limited. I submit for your examination today that Globalization is not only possible, it is rapidly approaching. For these reasons I affirm today's resolution. I stand ready and open for points of clarification and cross examination.
Please note that this sample paper on Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate, we are here to assist you.Your persuasive essayon Globalization Lincoln Douglas Debate will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
